Mamoswine
On 1.1% of teams at all Elo. It wins 49.0% of games it is in the preview for, within noise of even, and ranks 56 of 172 ranked species on that measure. Above 1300 it wins 49.9% (+0.9 pp), rank 41 of 77. Why the splits differ.
Seen on the ladder
4,008 games brought1.4 moves shown per game37% showed an item25% showed an ability
In the 4,008 games it was brought, it used High Horsepower in 41% and Protect in 27%. The item seen most is Life Orb, in 18%.
Moves used
Items revealed
Abilities revealed
Share of the games it was brought in which it showed each move, item or ability at least once, all Elo. Moves only show when used, items and abilities only when they trigger, so these are floors, not set frequencies. Open team sheets are not used. How reveals are counted.
All Elo
1.1% of teams65% brought38% lead6,311 teams
- On-team WR
- 49.095% CI 47.8–50.2 · n 6,229Every game it was in the preview.
- Full-reveal WR
- 47.795% CI 45.9–49.6 · n 2,767Brought, both sides showed four.
- Lead WR
- 49.695% CI 47.5–51.6 · n 2,365Games it led.
Partners, best to worst
No pair clears the sample and player thresholds yet.
0 partner pairs qualify (n ≥ 500, CI ≤ ±3 pp, ≥ 50 distinct players). Pair WR counts only games where both sides revealed all four.
Counters
Its side wins least against Golisopod: 45.8% (CI 42.9–48.8, n 1,098). It does best against Incineroar, at 51.5%. Of 7 opposing species with enough games, it is clearly below even against three and clearly above against zero.
Opponents, hardest first
- Golisopod45.8
- Indeedee-F47.2
- Sneasler47.6
- Kingambit48.0
- Rillaboom48.2
- Salamence48.2
- Incineroar51.5
On-team win rate of its side when the opponent’s preview has that species. Games where both previews hold both are left out. Cells need n ≥ 500, CI ≤ ±3 pp, ≥ 50 distinct players.
Leads
It is in the opening pair in 38% of games it is on a team for. Its usual lead partner is Salamence, in 12% of its leads, and that lead wins 55.8% (thin sample). No lead with it clears the sample bar yet.
Most common lead partners
- Salamence55.8
- Talonflame51.8
- Sneasler59.8
- Raichu44.2
- Indeedee-F46.2
Best-winning lead partners
No lead with it clears the sample and player thresholds yet.
Lead: the two species on the field at turn 1. Win rate excludes lead mirrors. Greyed rows are below the bar (n ≥ 500, CI ≤ ±3 pp, ≥ 50 distinct players). Leads are chosen after team preview.
Elo ≥ 1300
1.1% of teams68% brought42% lead1,430 teams
- On-team WR
- 49.995% CI 47.3–52.5 · n 1,422Every game it was in the preview.
- Full-reveal WR
- 47.6thin95% CI 43.8–51.3 · n 679Brought, both sides showed four.
- Lead WR
- 49.5thin95% CI 45.5–53.5 · n 600Games it led.
Partners, best to worst
No pair clears the sample and player thresholds yet.
0 partner pairs qualify (n ≥ 500, CI ≤ ±3 pp, ≥ 50 distinct players). Pair WR counts only games where both sides revealed all four.
Counters
No opposing species clears the sample and player thresholds yet.
Leads
It is in the opening pair in 42% of games it is on a team for. Its usual lead partner is Salamence, in 12% of its leads, and that lead wins 56.9% (thin sample). No lead with it clears the sample bar yet.
Most common lead partners
- Salamence56.9
- Sneasler58.7
- Talonflame50.0
- Raichu44.7
Best-winning lead partners
No lead with it clears the sample and player thresholds yet.
Lead: the two species on the field at turn 1. Win rate excludes lead mirrors. Greyed rows are below the bar (n ≥ 500, CI ≤ ±3 pp, ≥ 50 distinct players). Leads are chosen after team preview.