Mawile
On 1.6% of teams at all Elo. It wins 47.7% of games it is in the preview for, clearly below even, and ranks 76 of 172 ranked species on that measure. Above 1300 it wins 49.7% (+2.0 pp), rank 48 of 77. Why the splits differ.
Seen on the ladder
4,650 games brought1.7 moves shown per game90% showed an item52% showed an ability90% Mega Evolved
In the 4,650 games it was brought, it used Play Rough in 53% and Protect in 34%. The item seen most is Mawilite, in 90%.
Moves used
Items revealed
Abilities revealed
Share of the games it was brought in which it showed each move, item or ability at least once, all Elo. Moves only show when used, items and abilities only when they trigger, so these are floors, not set frequencies. Open team sheets are not used. How reveals are counted.
All Elo
1.6% of teams51% brought19% lead9,234 teams
- On-team WR
- 47.795% CI 46.7–48.7 · n 9,078Every game it was in the preview.
- Full-reveal WR
- 47.595% CI 45.8–49.2 · n 3,261Brought, both sides showed four.
- Lead WR
- 48.995% CI 46.5–51.2 · n 1,762Games it led.
Partners, best to worst
- Farigiraf47.1
1 partner pair qualify (n ≥ 500, CI ≤ ±3 pp, ≥ 50 distinct players). Pair WR counts only games where both sides revealed all four.
Counters
Its side wins least against Archaludon: 41.2% (CI 38.5–44.0, n 1,228). It does best against Gholdengo, at 49.2%. Of 16 opposing species with enough games, it is clearly below even against nine and clearly above against zero.
Hardest opponents
- Archaludon41.2
- Pelipper43.8
- Golisopod44.4
- Farigiraf45.4
- Incineroar46.0
Easiest opponents
- Gholdengo49.2
- Sneasler48.7
- Basculegion48.6
- Garchomp47.8
- Milotic47.7
On-team win rate of its side when the opponent’s preview has that species. Games where both previews hold both are left out. Cells need n ≥ 500, CI ≤ ±3 pp, ≥ 50 distinct players.
Leads
It is in the opening pair in 19% of games it is on a team for. Its usual lead partner is Farigiraf, in 26% of its leads, and that lead wins 48.1% (thin sample). No lead with it clears the sample bar yet.
Most common lead partners
- Farigiraf48.1
- Indeedee-F48.7
- Incineroar48.4
- Rillaboom41.7
- Milotic44.1
Best-winning lead partners
No lead with it clears the sample and player thresholds yet.
Lead: the two species on the field at turn 1. Win rate excludes lead mirrors. Greyed rows are below the bar (n ≥ 500, CI ≤ ±3 pp, ≥ 50 distinct players). Leads are chosen after team preview.
Elo ≥ 1300
1.2% of teams51% brought19% lead1,496 teams
- On-team WR
- 49.795% CI 47.1–52.2 · n 1,472Every game it was in the preview.
- Full-reveal WR
- 49.5thin95% CI 45.4–53.7 · n 549Brought, both sides showed four.
- Lead WR
- 49.3thin95% CI 43.5–55.1 · n 284Games it led.
Partners, best to worst
No pair clears the sample and player thresholds yet.
0 partner pairs qualify (n ≥ 500, CI ≤ ±3 pp, ≥ 50 distinct players). Pair WR counts only games where both sides revealed all four.
Counters
No opposing species clears the sample and player thresholds yet.
Leads
It is in the opening pair in 19% of games it is on a team for. Its usual lead partner is Farigiraf, in 27% of its leads, and that lead wins 44.7% (thin sample). No lead with it clears the sample bar yet.
Most common lead partners
- Farigiraf44.7
Best-winning lead partners
No lead with it clears the sample and player thresholds yet.
Lead: the two species on the field at turn 1. Win rate excludes lead mirrors. Greyed rows are below the bar (n ≥ 500, CI ≤ ±3 pp, ≥ 50 distinct players). Leads are chosen after team preview.